Your instructor and the librarian paired with your class will have given you the assignment instructions that are specific to your course. Generally, all FP students are being asked develop a bibliography containing source citations and source evaluations. Then, to write a reflection on the research process.
The assignment is due two weeks after your class attends the library session. You will submit your assignment through the Google form provided to you by the librarian.
This assignment is worth 20 points and will be graded using this rubric.
| 0 points | 1 - 2 points | 3 - 4 points | 5 points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source Selection | Source is not present or sources are not selected from the library catalog and/or library databases. | Not all sources present. Not all sources are selected from the library catalog or databases. Sources are irrelevant to the topic. | Three sources from the library catalog or databases are present. Sources are mostly relevant to the topic. | Three sources from the library catalog or databases that contain particularly relevant information to the topic. Sources do not repeat information. |
| Source Evaluations | Sources are not evaluated. | Not all sources are evaluated. Little to no information specific to the source is included in the evaluation. Most evaluation questions are not answered. | One component is missing or very limited in one or more evaluations. | Evaluations are included for all sources. Most or all questions are answered accurately. |
| Citation Accuracy | Citations are not present. | Not all citations present. Key information (author, title, journal, year) is missing. Little or no adherence to assigned style. | Citations mostly adhere to the assigned style. Citations are mostly correct with some formatting errors. Some key information (author, title, journal, year) missing. | Each source has a full citation that is formatted in the assigned style with minimal errors. |
| Reflection | Reflection is not present. | Most or all sources are not addressed. Description of research and selection processes is vague and/or unclear. | Sources are not fully addressed. Description of research and selection processes is somewhat vague and/or unclear. | Reflection fully addresses each source, and clearly and specifically describes the research and selection processes. |